Which tractor is better than MTZ or YuMZ: what is the difference, comparison of parameters, review

Tractors MTZ, YuMZ and LTZ: review of the best models

Machines from the Minsk Tractor Plant occupy a leading position in purchases for agricultural enterprises in Russia. The advantage of MTZ tractors, in addition to a wide range of models, is their versatility and aggregability with attachments, which allows the equipment to be used in various sectors of production. And yet they have competitors: self-propelled equipment from the Southern Machine-Building and Lipetsk Tractor Plants. Because of this, buyers often have a question about which tractor is better: MTZ, YuMZ or LTZ.

MTZ 80

The most famous tractor in the post-Soviet space, the “golden mean” of all machines produced in Minsk. Even old MTZ 80 models, preserved in good condition, can give a head start to modern technology. This is a tractor with high speed characteristics and wide functionality, while it is economical to maintain and repairable.

MTZ 80 is in demand mainly in small and medium-sized agricultural enterprises. Its main advantage is versatility. The purpose of the model is row-crop work, which wheeled vehicles are excellent at, while tracked varieties are used in forestry and the construction industry.

The MTZ 80 tractor is combined with mounted and trailed equipment to expand the functionality of the machine.

MTZ 82

The model, developed back in the 70s of the last century, is still popular today. Unlike the MTZ 80, on the basis of which the 82nd series was created, the vehicle received two drive axles, which made it possible to expand its functionality. Subsequently, the MTZ 82 was modernized several times, so today buyers often have doubts which MTZ 82 tractor is considered the best.

The 82nd model itself is presented in 3 modifications:

Tractor YuMZ 6 - reviews

Yuraz
https://gaz66.ru/forum3/viewtopic.php?p=142921&sid=028c7482142fc7e9a41e6b88073ac3e7#p142921

So I became the owner of this tractor. I took it from a person who didn’t service it on time, but seemed to keep the bundles safe (not all of them are true).

Minus - the engine oil was black, the oil filter was clogged, the centrifuge did not work. Replaced with regular diesel. oil, 40 rubles per liter, sold at gas stations. (by the way, it needs to be changed every 250 hours, according to the book). With new oil the pressure is 3+, when hot 2+, at the lowest speeds and hot 2-. There are no electrics at all, it will need to be restored. But judging by the diagram, all electrical equipment consists of lighting devices. Well, no big deal. The rubber is all bald and has radial cracks here and there.

pros

- inherent in any tractor - cross-country ability. I drove about 12 kilometers in a day. On clay and mud. Where the rear wheels are slipping (the tires are almost zero), I turned on the lock and immediately came out. Puddles and ruts of at least 30-40cm are no longer a problem! Autumn has passed, the roads in the forests are terrible, but at least there’s nothing on the tractor. I came across one swamp on the road, 5-6 wheel tracks wide, so many paths were made because everyone goes around this road swamp (UAZ, etc.) - I drove along the most hopeless rut, even for trucks, probably - well, I left as I entered - even with the gas pedal didn’t work Like setting the machine to 800 or 1000 rpm, turning on the second one, it goes and goes, I only held the lock with my heel. Nivovody set up camp nearby, because They can’t drive any further - where I left from, they just sighed heavily after

It starts from the starter, but I learned better from the starter, it’s more convenient than pulling the starter.

Michael

https://proogorod.com/selhoztekhnika/traktory/traktor-yumz-obzor#i-11

I met YuMZ-6 by chance. I bought it as a decommissioned piece of equipment for pennies. It took a couple of months to recover. A couple of spare parts are new, the rest I found in advertisements for used ones. Now he is my indispensable assistant in housekeeping.

pros

:
Simple Soviet tractor, sufficient power, simple design, long service life
Cons

:
The vibration is not weak when plowing, the seat is not the most comfortable, I still haven’t adjusted the gear shift, it’s tight.

Boris

https://truck.ironhorse.ru/yumz-6.html?comments=

Since 2007 I have been the owner of a YuMZ-6 1982 model. In a previous life, he was an excavator, and then he was converted into an ordinary tractor. I use it for plowing, cultivation, planting, making hay and firewood. In general, he helps me with almost everything. There is no power steering, but the steering wheel is easy to turn. In the future, of course, I am going to switch to hydraulic control with a dispenser. Engine – D-65.

There are no serious comments about him. I will say more, in cold weather it is easier to start than many other engines. The fuel tank is located at the front. In the cabin, under the seat, there is a starter battery for the starting engine and a tool box. There have been no problems with the clutch in three years of operation (I try not to burn it). The box also works properly.

The only thing is that the locking mechanism has recently been replaced. By the way, I didn’t have to remove the cabin for this - I did everything through the hatch. Of course, there are problems with spare parts - they are often out of stock. But they can bring anything you want to order. That's why I don't worry too much about it. In principle, the tractor suits me. I have never regretted buying it. The only sad thing is that you can’t put a front drive axle on it.

Termit13y

https://otzovik.com/review_5895455.html

Advantages:

reliability

Flaws:

speed.no front...

Yumz itself is a very reliable tractor. Its big disadvantage, as many have noticed, is that it does not have a front end. The front end helps a lot in the forest or in the field when you plow, for example. The checkpoint is also a minus. The tractor is very slow compared to MTZ. Speed ​​may not play a big role if the tractor is working in the forest. But when transporting any cargo, this significant drawback immediately comes to the fore. It is also now difficult to get spare parts for it. The weak point is the clutch. I advise you to buy this tractor if you are limited in money. Why essentially buy MTZ for 250 thousand if you can buy UMZ for 90 thousand (if you are limited in money, I repeat).

qwert1980

https://otzovik.com/review_5851315.html

Advantages:

savings easy start

Flaws:

no front axle

This year I bought a not new but quite passable tractor because I decided to start collecting firewood not only for myself but also for the population, and one car was not enough. What can I say about this technique from my conclusions: easy starting due to the decompressor, fuel efficiency, high torque due to the large mass. The downside is that the locking jumps, but I managed to adjust the traction and there is no front axle, which makes it difficult to work in the forest, but otherwise it’s all right.

Belarus 892

A modification of MTZ 82.1, therefore Belarus 892 is often compared with this tractor, figuring out which one is better. The main differences of the new model:

Thanks to modernization, the Belarus 892 tractor can be used in all types of agricultural work with the ability to cultivate large areas.

Advantages of model 892:

MTZ or LTZ

The MTZ 82 and LTZ 60 tractors also compete with each other. The question of which model is better is often discussed on forums, and as a result, the machines are considered absolutely equivalent. The disadvantage of LTZ can be considered low maintainability due to the closure of the main production.

Characteristics of LTZ 60:

MTZ is still considered more universal due to its greater power and the possibility of use in medium and large agricultural farms.

Source

Which tractor is better MTZ or YuMZ

Each machine can perform general work, plowing the soil, cultivating various crops, transporting goods, cleaning streets, and digging ditches. The units are used in the field of housing and communal services, restoration and repair work. In order to understand which tractor is better, you need to consider several important factors:

The car must be selected taking into account all the specified characteristics, which will save money, and the purchased MTZ-82 or YuMZ will not sit idle in the garage.

Let us consider a number of parameters of these models that differ from each other. The units produced by the Minsk Tractor Plant and the Southern Machine-Building Plant must be distinguished according to the characteristics of specific models and the type of work performed.

Both units were created based on the model of the Belarusian plant MTZ-5.

The machines differ from each other in the following technical characteristics:

Which tractor is better to buy MTZ-80 or YuMZ-6

The post-war years in the USSR were not at all characterized by complete devastation and decline. On the contrary, due to many factors there was a rapid growth of the economy and national economy. And the economy required good tools for its development.

The development of new lands, work with those already in use, as well as intensive life in the countryside led to the production of new agricultural machines. If before this the Union was content with developments based on American prototypes, then in the 50s engineers no longer looked overseas for ideas. Typical representatives of those times, hard workers familiar to everyone, MTZ-80 and YuMZ-6 , deservedly occupy an honorable place in the history of tractor construction. Are they relevant today, and which one should you consider purchasing?

Comparison of tractor parameters

Let's look at how the cars differ. To understand which is better than YuMZ or MTZ, you need to pay attention to the following indicators:

The engine power is 62 hp, which allows you to install various attachments on the tractor.

Each of the models has a portal front axle; only the MTZ has a spring suspension installed on its wheels, which is a telescopic type. YuMZ has a rigid suspension, which affects the movement and level of comfort while driving the car.

YuMZ has a double-flow clutch installed, which has a higher level of reliability, lower wear and longer operation, compared to the single-flow clutch found at MTZ.

Let's compare the parameters of YuMZ versus MTZ and find out all the differences. The equipment of the Southern Machine-Building Plant is equipped with an improved gearbox and gearbox with 1 lever. The Minsk machine has 2 levers, each one controls a separate unit.

The southern model has a PTO drive, which switches to different modes - synchronous and two-speed (independent). The Minsk unit also has a two-speed drive system, but it is of the independent type.

The Belarus tractor is equipped with a high-quality hydraulic linkage system, which is automatically adjusted. This allows you to change the plowing mode, including depth, and change the amount of coupled weight. Such functions are not provided on the YuTZ unit, so the Minsk model is better suited for agricultural work, rather than the machine from the Southern Machine-Building Plant. Although the southern design has an improved operator's cab for greater comfort, a machine with a modern control system is better suited for field work. This will allow you to install any equipment and drive on difficult soils.

Tractors have continuous track adjustment systems, which are located at the rear wheels. Steering columns on YuMZ allow adjustment in height and steering angle, as a result of which tractor drivers independently select a convenient and comfortable control mode. Most Belarus models do not have such a function; it is provided only on the MTZ-80 model.

Thus, farmers must decide for themselves which tractor to buy. It is necessary to study the description of each model in detail before spending money on purchasing special equipment. Units that differ in technical characteristics must be studied both according to the model range and user reviews.

Both units are reliable, economical and unpretentious equipment that will not let you down during work in the field, city, construction site or other sites.

Debriefing: or which tractor is better than Yumz or MTZ?!

The right approach

When deciding to buy special equipment to equip your organization or, if necessary, rent it, it is important not only to make a good choice and save a certain amount of money. You need to know and understand which tractor is better than YuMZ or MTZ and place an order (rental application) taking into account the upcoming work. Well, for this it is important to know at least the general principles of selection and the characteristic features of two tractors that are similar in many respects, but still quite different.

Characteristic distinctive features of YuMZ and MTZ

In general, it is quite difficult to determine which tractor is better than YuMZ or MTZ . It all depends on the type of work to be done, as well as the specific technical characteristics of the models being compared. In general, both tractors MTZ and YuMZ are special equipment created on the basis of one basic model - MTZ-5, and they belong to the “Belarus” family, well known not only in Russia, but also in many other countries. At the same time, it is necessary to know and understand that the design of the tractors we are considering differs in many respects. This is the manufacture of a number of components and assemblies, a schematic diagram of the installation of systems that ensure the operation of the power unit, electrical equipment and other parameters, which in the process of creating a particular sample received their own, original components, as well as design changes.

Comparison of models

To make it easier to make a choice, we will make a brief comparison of the main components, which will help us decide which tractor is better than YuMZ or MTZ.

In general, the power of the tractors (62 hp) allows them to install a wide variety of units, high-tech, combined equipment, with the help of which a wide range of different operations can be performed. Well, now – the differences that will help you decide for yourself which tractor is better than YuMZ or MTZ for the job.

• The front axle of both models is portal, but the MTZ wheels have a telescopic spring suspension, while the YuMZ has a rigid suspension, which undoubtedly affects the comfort of movement.
• YuMZ is equipped with a double-flow clutch, which, compared to the single-flow clutch on its competitor, is characterized by increased reliability, service life and less wear.
• The control of the gearbox and gearbox at YuMZ has also been simplified and improved, where there is only one lever (for MTZ there are 2 levers - one for each unit).
• The PTO drive at YuMZ has the ability to switch and operate in different modes - independent two-speed or synchronous. At YuMZ the drive is also two-speed, but the type is independent.
• MTZ compares favorably with the quality of its hydraulic attachment system, which is automatically controlled. It is possible to change the depth of plowing, as well as change the value of the coupled weight. A competitor cannot boast of such a set of options. Obviously, if agricultural work is planned, then the choice in favor of MTZ is obvious. Although the tractor driver may not be comfortable enough in the cab, the level of control of attachments and systems is significantly higher.
• Both tractors have the ability to smoothly adjust the track of the rear wheel pair, but the steering column of YuMZ has the ability to adjust both in height and offset angle. This approach allows each tractor driver to choose the most convenient and comfortable operating mode for special equipment. In the model range of MTZ tractors, only one model can boast of such an option – the MTZ-80.

Main differences

Let's look at what distinctive features the MTZ and YuMZ tractors have. The difference between these two types of models is colossal; they are similar only in equipment. But it is precisely this similarity that leads to the fact that users often confuse them with each other. In addition, MTZ and YuMZ have the same name “Belarus”. Although MTZ is produced in Minsk, and YuMZ in Dnepropetrovsk (Ukraine). Every year these models are becoming heavier, especially for such brands as YuMZ 6 and T 40.

Comparison of equipment models

Both tractors are made on the basis of the same model - MTZ-5. They belong to the Belarusian family, which is famous not only in Russia, but also in many other countries. In terms of functionality, it is difficult to say how MTZ differs from YuMZ. It all depends on the type of work to be done and the specific technical characteristics of the models being compared. The same power (62 hp) allows you to install various units and high-tech combined devices that allow you to perform a variety of operations.

The range of applications for both tractors is extensive and includes:

• general purpose work;
• processing of vegetable and spring crops with the ability to move between rows;
• year-round transportation of goods, including in difficult terrain, off-road, etc.;
• cleaning streets, dirt roads, park paths, clearing snow;
• trench digging;
• carrying out repair work at various facilities.

MTZ and YuMZ are in great demand among consumers.
Despite all the similarities, the design of the models under consideration differs in many respects. This is the manufacture of a series of components and assemblies, a schematic diagram of the installation of systems that ensure the operation of the power source, electrical equipment and other parameters that had their own original components when creating a specific model, as well as structural changes.

It is better to analyze how MTZ differs from YuMZ in the following parameters:

1. Comfort of movement. The front axle on both models is of the portal type, however, there are differences in the suspension design: on the MTZ “Belarus” it is designed using a telescopic spring type, while the YuMZ is equipped with a rigid structure.
2. Ease and precision of control. YuMZ is equipped with a two-line coupling, which is characterized by increased reliability, durability and less wear compared to the single-line MTZ coupling. This also simplified and improved transmission and transmission control at YuMZ, where there is only one lever (Belarus has 2 levers - one for each unit).
3. PTO drive modes. At YuMZ it can switch and operate in different modes - independently of two speeds or synchronously. At MTZ the drive is also two-stage, but the type is independent.
4. Hydraulic system configuration options. Unlike YuMZ, on Belarus you can adjust the change in plow depth and many other parameters. Overall, it provides more precise control over implements and systems.
5. Operator comfort. On all YuMZ tractors, the steering column can be adjusted in height and angle. This approach allows each tractor driver to choose the most convenient and convenient control mode for special equipment. In the range of tractors from the Minsk plant there is only one model with this option - MTZ-80.

MTZ 50-80 UMZ which one to choose?

Questions can only be asked after registration. Please login or register.

The MTZ 50 may have problems with engine repair, because spare parts are no longer produced, everything else is the same as on the MTZ 80, in the end, many try to transfer the engine from the 80 to the 50.

There are differences across the bridge - at least the differentials are different

We once changed the differential to 50, maybe because we found some friends didn’t notice any difference. And so we had the 50 and the 80 didn’t really mess with the transmission, it’s quite reliable on these tractors, especially since the 50 was made in the USSR and they didn’t spare metal

Regarding the YuMZ box, not everything is clear, many YuMZs come with grab loaders and don’t break down too much, I have a PEA-1.0, which has an engine and transmission from YuMZ, and it weighs about 7 tons, so far there have been no problems

I wanted to shade the satellites with the axles (there is a small amount of wear), but I couldn’t find them; on 80k they are larger in size.

But the body is bigger, maybe the body can be changed.

Tell us about the condition of the tractors.

Tell us about the condition of the tractors.

It should be beautiful without dents, the engine and transmission are dry, clean, not smoking, starts right away, connections are not broken, clear gear shifting, smooth engine sound, i.e. a new tractor. But seriously, the bottom line is “what did you want for that kind of money!?” I choose the technique myself according to my inner feelings and logic. So far it hasn't let me down.

But the body is bigger, maybe the body can be changed.

Maybe different cases, but I didn’t bother

By the way, what to pay attention to when inspecting a tractor first.

connection of the engine with the gap, the condition of the engine (breathing, smoking, extraneous sounds) If everything is thoroughly washed, this is a bad sign, usually if the engine, axle gearbox are in good condition and do not snot, then they have a working coating of dust without any streaks, etc., and carefully There is no need to wash. In general, if possible, take an experienced tractor driver with you.

In my opinion, MTZ is better than YuMZ. Repairing MTZ is much easier. Spare parts at YuMZ are very bad

It's also a problem of choice. Think.

MTZ 82. everything else is bullshit. yumz if you work a lot on the bridge and gearbox every month for repairs. 80 is good, but in plowing and mud it swallows dust. and 82 fire, but if it is of course but 30 years old, and if the trailer is towed by a Yumz turtle and you can feel all the bumps with the ridge, the MTZ is an airplane and rides smoothly like a Lada.

Of course MTZ-80. Spare parts for it are available in any store. The 50's gap is completely different: the shafts and partitions, the bottom cover. The clutch is completely different, the flywheel, the basket and the disc. The engine is difficult to start even in summer. I’m already silent about the leaky cabin. Another big minus is that there is no Zhorik on the fifty-kopeck piece, i.e. low gear. Plus, rear wheel locking. All this can be fully supplied from 80k, but it will cost. Therefore, it is better to take 80k right away. YuMZ is not a competitor to them due to the high cost of spare parts and their lack of availability. Basically an order.

I don’t quite agree about the gap. On the first MTZ-50, the body was different from the MTZ-80. But in the latest ones (late 70s) it is the same. MTZ-50 and MTZ-80 were produced in parallel for some time (10 years), in this case they are more unified. on mine there is a hole in the gap for the PTO shift shaft 540-1000, but my neighbor’s gap is different (his is 72 years old, I think)

In 1974, the plant began serial production of the MTZ-80. The tractor was conceived as a base one, taking into account the development of a new family of unified energy-rich tractors, both wheeled and tracked. The main differences between the MTZ-80 tractor and the MTZ-50 tractor were the following:

Source

Which tractor should you choose?

Despite the great similarity, sometimes it is not entirely correct to compare them. First of all, the choice depends on this.

Since Belarusians still produce models that have already become classics, like the UAZ or Niva, those who need a new tractor should definitely look in their direction first. The youngest YuMZ-6 is almost 20 years .

Naturally, a new car is expensive. With sufficient financial support, there are no problems in purchasing. But when the task is to save maximum money, then YuMZ-6 is beyond competition.

An important factor is the possibility of maintenance . Availability of spare parts and service determines operational efficiency. Basically, due to the prevalence and versatility of many units, both representatives have no problems with this. But different regions of the country are structured differently. Before buying, you should make sure that there is definitely enough of everything at the place of operation, and the craftsmen will not scratch their heads and study a new machine.

Hard work, large volumes will require preference for new technology . This includes a manufacturer’s guarantee, complete absence of breakdowns for some time, and great endurance. Since Yuzhmash discontinued its model a long time ago, it cannot boast of being ready for modern requirements for high labor productivity. But for personal farming it is perfect.

A thoughtful choice, a clear understanding of your requirements for technology - this is what determines the right choice.